Andros Fenollosa <[email protected]> writes: > ~delete-trailing-whitespace~ is a big problem. Only the following survive: > > - U+200C (ZWNJ - Zero Width Non-Joiner) > - U+200D (ZWJ - Zero Width Joiner) > - U+2060 (WJ - Word Joiner) > - U+FEFF (ZWNBSP - Zero Width No-Break Space)
I see. To be clear, the tag markers also survive right? So the straightforward solution of adding a tag (as someone else mentioned) would also work. Another option would be to use a function other than `delete-trailing-whitespace' which has the desired semantics. > It can be suggested in the documentation. But doesn't that make it > more complex? It certainly adds to the documentation. But it also doesn't modify syntax and is backwards compatible. There are arguments to be made for both. -- Suhail
