Derek Chen-Becker <[email protected]> writes: > That sounds reasonable. Updated patch attached.
Applied, thanks for sticking with this. And thanks to everyone for hashing out the possible misunderstandings. Ultimately, I want to move this now very detailed definition of A--Z into an infobox or a new subsection of [[worg/org-syntax.org::*Terminology and conventions]]. That way, we can define "alphabetic characters" (or even "English letters"?) in one place and go back to using shorthand in the priority cookies description as well as keep it elsewhere on the page. But first I want to double check that the other references to "alphabetic characters" in org-syntax.org mean the same thing. Regards, Christian
