poverobuosodonati <poverobuosodon...@gmail.com> writes: >> Consider header argument set for a subtree: > This actually works without an explicit "yes" (or similar) option. This > is because `org-babel-default-header-args:csharp' checks for "no" and > only if that is given as a header-arg, it will omit the main function in > expanding the code block. Anything other than "no" (including no ":main" > header-argument at all) will result in `main-p' evaluating to `t' and > result in an expanded code block that has a main function. > But yes, there should be a test for this "implicit behavior". There I'd > have another question though: I understand that this implicit assumption > is not exactly /elegant/. Should we transition to an explicit check for > either "yes" or "no"? I am a bit undecided here tbh. I will however > adapt the code accordingly and add an appropriate test.
Most babel packages are rather lax on yes/no. Often, something like :header-arg (lisp-expr ...), when evaluates to non-nil and not "no", is treated as "yes". So, what you do is fine. But it should be documented. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode maintainer, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
