Wasn’t there rsvg-convert as a CLI friendly alternative? /PA while shopping;-) Enviado desde mi iPhone
> El 2 may 2025, a las 18:57, Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> escribió: > > Emin Martinian <emin.martin...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Briefly speaking, the current latex export of SVG files does not work out >> of the box and requires adding --shell-escape to the latex args and also >> installing inkscape. Even with those, I found the process brittle. If we >> are going to require inkscape for SVG handling, it seems cleaner to me to >> just use inkscape to convert SVG to PDF and then use \includegraphics >> instead of relying on something like \includesvg >> <https://github.com/bzg/org-mode/blob/b6dbf8881076191e1351d7cd15e26547a2531fea/lisp/ox-latex.el#L2879>. >> Also, if we go with the path of converting SVG to PDF, we can allow/support >> other conversion programs like rsvg-convert. Finally, if other backend >> exporters want to support SVG, converting SVG to PDF (or other formats) can >> support that in a similar way. > > In other words, should we try to go around \usepackage{svg} and instead > convert svg->pdf ourselves, without forcing users to provide > --shell-escape? Even in LuaLaTeX, where --shell-escape is not neccesary, > svg may not render correctly without inkscape. > > -- > Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, > Org mode maintainer, > Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. > Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, > or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
