> Currently, `org-add-note' ordering is controlled by > `org-log-states-order-reversed'. > > I am afraid that changing the current status quo may create confusion. > We might introduce a new variable `org-log-note-order-reversed' just for > interactive notes. WDYT?
So for the record, this is the current state of things: | Action | How to reverse filing order | |---------+--------------------------------------| | Refile | org-reverse-note-order | | Capture | :prepend key in org-capture template | | Note | org-log-states-order-reversed | | Archive | ??? | You can see the confusion here: `org-reverse-note-order' does not apply to `org-add-note', and there is no consistency in the configuration for reversing various filings. I don't know how to reverse the filing order for archiving (assuming you don't use datetree archiving.) I think we can leave these methods untouched for compatibility but introduce some consistent aliases? | Action | How to reverse filing order | |---------+-------------------------------| | Refile | Introduce org-refile-prepend | | Capture | Introduce org-capture-prepend | | Note | Introduce org-note-prepend | | Archive | ??? | Any consistent set of names should be fine, so perhaps `org-refile-order', or `org-refile-reverse', and so on. `org-capture-prepend' would be new functionality since there is no way to reverse the default capturing order as far as I know. Karthik
