> Hmm. Maybe we have a misunderstanding. I was talking about > `org-link-preview-file' signature.
Yes, I misunderstood. > With the new signature, (org-link-preview-file ov path link) will be > still ok. The point is that other callers that want to use > `org-link-preview-file' independently may use the alternative calling > convention. I think the signature change makes sense now, thanks for the clarification. I'm not sure about passing "align", as this should be read from the link attributes. I'm assuming the "width" specified in the link attributes will apply on top of the width argument to this function? Karthik
