On 19 January 2025 3:45:05 pm GMT+05:30, Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> wrote: >Pranshu <pran...@bauherren.ovh> writes: > >> I think being able to customise the run-haskell function and the haskell >> buffer name should be enough, since they both use comit > >No, it is not. >We use `haskell-mode', `run-haskell', `inferior-haskell-load-file', >`haskell-prompt-regexp', `inferior-haskell-buffer', and >`inferior-haskell-root-dir' variables relying on very specific behavior >of haskell-mode. > >Changing things to support alternatives to haskell-mode might be doable, >but certainly not trivial. Most likely, we can only do it on >case-by-case basis. >
I see, I will have a look at trying to make it work later.
