Rudolf Adamkovič <rud...@adamkovic.org> writes: >>> (image-type "...-59b9176e65c9.svg") => svg >> >> Why do you think that the output file is always an image? It may not >> be. It can be anything. > > I do not think that. I specifically addressed the non-image case: the > file would retain the `out' extension.
Reasonable. > But, we could be smart about other file types as well, if we use > e.g. `file', like `dired-show-file-type' does. Yes. Although there is another possible problem - current implementation computes file _before_ the code block is evaluated. In fact, this thread started from exactly this scenario - get the file name before it appears on disk. And we have no clue about what will be inside the file at that point. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode maintainer, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
