not following this. but it amused me:
>> In rare cases, an inquiry from an >> +Org maintainer gets the process moving again. > > may be missing something, but the last sentence now reads like our >(Org maintainer's) inquiry rarely works. while it can definitely read that way, to me as a native speaker at least, it is reasonably ok, although ambiguous. it is saying, somewhat casually, that in rare cases it is /needed/ for the org maintainer to intervene and he or she does so successfully or so. removing ambiguity would help, but nto a huge deal. apropos of nothing, ambiguity should be eliminated from medical textbooks and papers. "rarely, ...." can be interpreted like, it's rare so look for horses not zebras [neglecting that zebras exist], or it's rare but consider it and find out more about it, or various other things. -- The Kafka Pandemic A blog about science, health, human rights, and misopathy: https://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com
