Ihor Radchenko writes: > I see your point. > Although I am still a bit hesitant to remove > `org-latex-line-break-safe'. > What would be the benefit of removing it? For now, I mostly just see > that it will make the life harder for users in Scenario B.
It's a complicated situation, because we now have two solutions to the same problem... It certainly sounds a bit abrupt to remove org-latex-line-break-safe (at least for now). I see no problem in both solutions coexisting. After all, the user can always give an "\\\\" value to org-latex-line-break-safe. The other possibility is that org-latex-line-break-safe is selectively deleted, as you mentioned in a previous email. In tables and verse blocks, unless I'm missing something, I think adding [0pt] would be unnecessary, with the new solution. > For verse blocks, AFAIU, even \\ is problematic. (Correct me if I am wrong) >From the tests I have done, the problem of the vertical space being altered after the verse environment only appears when the last line ends in \\[0pt]. If it ends in \\ the problem does not appear. It is not recommended that a verse environment ends in \\, but it does not seem to influence the output. In fact, that was how it was in Org in the days pre org-latex-line-break-safe and there were never any problems. Best regards, Juan Manuel
