Eli Zaretskii <e...@gnu.org> writes: Hi,
>> > I don't think woman.el is being developed, or is it? >> >> Do you mean that woman.el will be obsoleted? > > AFAIU, it already is, de-facto. Unless someone steps forward and > volunteers to develop woman.el so as to add all the many missing > features that Groff has added during the last years, woman.el will > continue to bitrot. In my long-term TODO there is adding support for man pages on remote hosts. This is counted for man.el, no plans for woman.el. See discussion at bug#46911. (Unfortunately, no progress yet). Just a data point. Best regards, Michael.
