Max Nikulin <maniku...@gmail.com> writes: >> If we talk about image attributes defined in the affiliated keywords, we >> should better resort to #+ATTR_HTML. Introducing extra affiliated >> keyword would be a breaking change. > > I am sorry that I was not clear enough. It may be 3 boolean attributes > that may be specified in #+ATTR_HTML: or single one that may take 3 > values for <img>/<object>/<svg>.
Agree. I am in favour of a single attribute. However, AFAIU, <img> is not always applicable because it does not allow embedding and <svg> demands embedding. So, this may need to be discussed more carefully with more input from people familiar with HTML conventions. > The only issue with #+ATTR_HTML: is that it is applied to all images > inside a paragraph. So it can not control individual inline images. That's a general issue. We have it, we know about it, we have previously discussed how to solve it. But it should not distract us from adding this particular feature. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
