Leo Butler <leo.but...@umanitoba.ca> writes:
> Ok, stopping after 1 seems reasonable when the code block is meant to
> produce just the executable. But, your suggestion would mean that the
> code block can *only* produce an executable file. Maybe that is ok, but
> since the current semantics allow something like
>
> #+begin_src C++ :includes <iostream> <fstream> :results file :file
> ./results.csv
> using namespace std;
> for(int i=0; i<10; i++){ cout << i << "," << i*i << endl; }
> #+end_src
>
> so I am not sure that we should break that.
Fair point.
> On the other hand, I don't see any sense in producing a link to the
> binary file. Org can't do anything with that link, so the user would
> need to write something like ":results file :file /path/to :wrap
> comment". That is why I would prefer something like a :bin-file header.
I am not sure how I feel about such side effects of evaluation.
Is there any other babel backend that is doing something similar?
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
