Morgan Willcock <morgan@ice9.digital> writes: >> https://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#img >> >> Therefore, Org mode is doing everything right within the scope of MD >> specification we follow. Pandoc does not. > > I don't think that Markdown has a single specification.
Indeed. And the one in daringfireball is what we historically follow since >10 years ago, when ox-md has been implemented. > Perhaps it is a bug that ox-md is not following a specification, and > this would be fixed by using a specification and passing its test suite: Please provide concrete examples where ox-md does not follow specification. The title/caption issue herein does not qualify. https://spec.commonmark.org/0.30/#images also defines  with "title" being the title, as we currently use it in ox-md when exporting captions. > https://commonmark.org/ I agree that using CommonMark.org as the source of truth will make more sense, given that the original daringfireball.net is not precise. It would be helpful if someone examines whether ox-md is consistent with CommonMark. > However, if ox-md is intentionally trying to match the behaviour of the > original Markdown.pl, the Pandoc format that matches this is > "markdown_strict" and not "markdown". > > i.e. Pandoc's "markdown" format is not the same format which is > described at daringfireball.net: > > https://pandoc.org/MANUAL.html#pandocs-markdown Indeed. ox-md is certainly not aiming to export to Pandoc's markdown flavour. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
