Looks reasonable... we put the .org and .bib file(s) in the same directory and we can use relative paths... That's what I would do in a pure LaTeX environment (and in overleaf.com)
Could be expanded to same directory or its leaves... like when I have the .org file and a bibliography directory in the same directory... (Just thinking aloud) Will check tomorrow before starting with /real life/ ;-) Thx, /PA On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 at 16:12, Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> wrote: > > Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez <paag...@gmail.com> writes: > > > Having said that, I was also (just a bit) bugged by the fact that > > bibliography file names are completely expanded when generating LaTeX. > > Couldn't we avoid that for LaTeX export? > > It is in `org-cite-list-bibliography-files'. > AFIAU, full path is forced there to make #+SETUP containing local > bibliography path work: > > ---- main.org ----- > #+SETUP: settings.org > ------ end -------- > > ---- ../settings.org ----- > #+BIBLIOGRAPHY: local.bib > -------------------------- > > One reasonable option could be keeping relative paths relative iff the > #+BIBLIOGRAPHY is derived from a file inside the same directory with the > exported file. > > Tentative patch attached. > > > > -- > Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, > Org mode contributor, > Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. > Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, > or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92> -- Fragen sind nicht da um beantwortet zu werden, Fragen sind da um gestellt zu werden Georg Kreisler Headaches with a Juju log: unit-basic-16: 09:17:36 WARNING juju.worker.uniter.operation we should run a leader-deposed hook here, but we can't yet
