Hello Ken, thank you for your message, After reading the very interesting get_property function, I found that even though I will probably use it for some cases, it doesn’t apply directly, to my case.
For more examples, if I have 1 source code block: >> #+name: greeting >> #+begin_src sh :var name="world" :results output :session testing >> >> echo "hello, $name\!" >> #+end_src I have three options in noweb to use this: - Use its body into another begin_src source code block with <<greeting>> - Use its result “hello, world!” Into another code block, which results in babel trying to execute the hello, command, which doesn’t exist, this with <<greeting()>> - Use its result, the same as above, but with another parameter, results in the same but the variable name is different, so <<greeting(name=“another name”)>> I’m trying to do the first, but with another parameter, so Use its body into another begin_src source code block with, get the resulting body after changing the variable without it being evaluated, so that I get a valid command to get to bash, like with <<greeting>>, but I can specify a different name variable. I found the [:body] param but, even though it lets me change the variable as I want, it then tries to evaluate it, so I get a different value but the same hello, command doesn’t exist. Even though what I would want is to get echo “hello, $name\!” but, $name is different. Thank you for your response Ken, I hope I gave a clearer example with the above. > 16/3/23 5:16、Ken Mankoff <mank...@gmail.com>のメール: > > Hi, > > I'm not sure that I understand your issue or needs from the provided > examples, but I wonder if the example I provide here would be helpful. It > bypasses :var an lets you inject a PROPERTY value anywhere. It is also > language agnostic. You can use it to execute commands (that are set as > PROPERTY values) or set variables to values. > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2023-03/msg00251.html > > -k. > > On 2023-03-15 at 18:54 -04, suarezmigu...@icloud.com wrote... >> Hello Org-mode community. I’m using Emacs Doom Framework, specifically: >> >> Emacs 28.2 (build 1, aarch64-apple-darwin22.3.0, Carbon Version 169 >> AppKit 2299.4) of 2023-02-23. >> >> I use heavily org-mode for Literate DevOps, so I have a lot of shell >> commands that connect through SSH and do some things later, for >> example: >> >> #+name: initSSH >> #+begin_src shell :var connection=“admin@somehost" >> >> ssh -t miguel@host "sudo -u someuser ssh -t $connection 'sudo su'" >> #+end_src >> >> So then I can call: >> >> #+call: initSSH(connection=“admin@anotherhost”) >> >> With any other header parameters or session, the above works >> correctly. I cannot use tramp due to network latency issues, so this >> is the most performance way for me, since I also have to do some >> multi-hops which are indeed supported in tramp, but it is too slow for >> me, so I rather only commands. >> >> The thing is that, I then would like to call these not with a #+call >> function, but add them into a bigger script, let’s say that I define >> another command: >> >> #+name: getStorage >> #+begin_src shell >> >> df >> #+end_src >> >> Which has to be run in a remote server, could be any remote server as >> I have to connect to several. So I would like to be able to: >> >> #+begin_src shell >> <<initSSH(connection=“admin@anotherhost”)>> >> <<getStorage>> >> #+end_src >> >> >> The first doesn’t work as org-mode runs the code and passes the >> resulting string to bash, which isn’t a command. The latter works >> normally. So the issue here are the parameters. >> >> So I made another simple example for this: >> >> #+name: greeting >> #+begin_src sh :var name="world" :results output :session testing >> >> echo "hello, $name\!" >> #+end_src >> >> #+results: greeting >> #+begin_src sh >> >> hello, world\! >> #+end_src >> >> #+begin_src shell >> <<greeting(name="ss")>> >> #+end_src >> >> >> This results in sh: hello,: command not found, as it is executing the >> function. I see in the documentation that I can: >> - Call a function’s body with <<namedcodeblock>> >> - Execute a function and return its results with <<namedcodeblock()>> >> - Execute a function and return its results even with different params with >> <<namedcodeblock(param=“sds”)>> >> >> So right now, the one that’s missing is, call a function’s body with >> different parameters. So the >> function <<namedcodeblock>> is not evaluated. >> >> After searching a lot, I came across: >> >> #+begin_src shell :session testing >> <<greeting[:body](name="Testingggg")>> >> #+end_src >> >> Which results in: >> >> sh-3.2$ PS1="org_babel_sh_prompt> " >> org_babel_sh_prompt> name='Testingggg' >> org_babel_sh_prompt> echo "hello, $name\!" >> hello, Testingggg\! >> org_babel_sh_prompt> echo 'org_babel_sh_eoe' >> org_babel_sh_eoe >> org_babel_sh_prompt> hello, Testingggg\! >> sh: hello,: command not found >> org_babel_sh_prompt> echo 'org_babel_sh_eoe' >> org_babel_sh_eoe >> org_babel_sh_prompt> >> >> Which is somewhat what I need since at least the variable is changed, >> but the result of this execution is also passed to shell so, same >> error. >> >> I can’t find much documentation about this, what is the correct syntax >> here?, >> >> Thank you! >
