Ihor Radchenko writes on Fri 10 Feb 2023 09:56: > Only a handful of interactive commands support invisible edit > checks. In particular: self-insert-command (typing), deleting char > forward/backward, and `org-meta-return'. > > I guess we may instead provide a defcustom and hook the check into > `pre-command-hook'. Would it be of interest?
Thank you for the feedback. Let me add that the issue I raised was not at all a theoretical/abstract one for me. I constantly use 'undo' to see where in the buffer I was working (then, I insert a space, do 'undo undo', and can resume what I was doing). So obviously it would be of a huge interest for me if org-catch-invisible-edits worked in that case... At any rate, shouldn't "2.2.3 Catching invisible edits" be a little bit more specific about what kind of invisible edits are concerned? Or perhaps just a warning that it is not all of them. > > PS: a very minor incidental point: after 'bar' has disappeared, the > > headline is then void, so I tend to say that the ellipsis should > > immediately disappear as well. > > The headline still contains newlines. Right. Thanks. -- EOST (École et Observatoire des Sciences de la Terre) ITE (Institut Terre & Environnement) | alain.coch...@unistra.fr 5 rue René Descartes [bureau 110] | Phone: +33 (0)3 68 85 50 44 F-67084 Strasbourg Cedex, France | [ slot available for rent ]
