Edgar Lux <edgar...@mailfence.com> writes:
> I thought that it would be preferable to have a native Org syntax.
>
>> I do not like passing the options as-is in #+cite_export because not all
>> the possible biblatex \usepackage options are affecting the
>> bibliography. Options like sortcites, maxcitenames, autocite, etc are
>> only affecting the citation style, not the bibliography. And options
>> like bibencoding are totally irrelevant to both citation and
>> bibliography styles.
>
> That's fair, but it can just as well be used as a line to configure biblatex
> (since it is already being used anyway). Besides, there are many other
> options which do concern the style or are very needed
> (hyperref=true,backref=true,url=true,backend=biber,natbib=true). I'm not
> advocating for my suggestion, just showing my reasoning. As I said, I'm fine
> with the =#+latex_header:=.
I understand. My takeaway from here is that there is a need to provide
extended global defaults for both bibliography style and citation style.
>> This code is by Nicolas, but does not seem to be consistent with the
>> idea of "BIBLIOGRAPHY STYLE".
>>
>> I am CCing him in cause if there is something I am missing.
>
> The docstring says:
>
> ;; "cite_export" keyword. If you need to use different styles for
> bibliography
> ;; and citations, you can separate them with "bibstyle/citestyle" syntax.
> E.g.,
> ;;
> ;; #+cite_export: biblatex authortitle/authortitle-ibid
Which is a questionable design choice. I was referring to higher-level
docstring for `org-cite-export-processors':
(NAME BIBLIOGRAPHY-STYLE CITATION-STYLE)
There, NAME is the name of a registered citation processor providing export
functionality, as a symbol. BIBLIOGRAPHY-STYLE (respectively
CITATION-STYLE)
is the desired default style to use when printing a bibliography
(respectively
exporting a citation), as a string or nil. Both BIBLIOGRAPHY-STYLE and
CITATION-STYLE are optional. NAME is mandatory.
oc-biblatex simply deviates from the global paradigm, making oc-biblatex
special compared to other citation processors. Not ideal.
I think that we have a fundamental design flaw with org-cite:
#+cite_export: processor bibliography-style citation-style
introduces:
- default bibliography style set document-wide
- default citation style set individually in every citation via
low-level commands, BUT NOT GLOBAL DEFAULT CITATION STYLE.
Basically, CITATION_STYLE cannot currently affect document preamble by
design.
That's why awkward workarounds in oc-biblatex, where default citation
style can be set globally, and we have to attach citation style to
BIBLIOGRAPHY_STYLE keyword.
I suggest the following changes to the org-cite:
1. :export-finalizer should accept export processor triplet instead of
bibliography style as 4th argument. The assumption that only
bibliography style is required to finalize the export is clearly not
accurate.
2. Allow passing extra arguments in #+cite_export:
#+cite_export: processor[opt1=val1,opt2=val2,...] bibliography-style[...]
citation-style[...]
The options listed within the square brackets will pass extra default options
to the processor/styles and used as needed by citation processor
implementations.
WDYT?
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
