alain.coch...@unistra.fr writes:
> The last paragraph of this docstring is:
>
> It is strongly recommended that you set ‘org-cycle-max-level’ not
> at all, or to a number smaller than this one. In fact, when
> ‘org-cycle-max-level’ is not set, it will be assumed to be one less
> than the value of smaller than the value of this variable.
>
> I do not understand the last sentence, even assuming that the 1st 'of'
> is 'or'. Is my English the problem?
That sentence is indeed screwed up.
Does `org-cycle-max-level' docstring sound better?
Maximum level which should still be subject to visibility cycling.
Levels higher than this will, for cycling, be treated as text, not a
headline.
When `org-odd-levels-only' is set, a value of N in this variable actually
means 2N-1 stars as the limiting headline.
When nil, cycle all levels.
Note that the limiting level of cycling is also influenced by
`org-inlinetask-min-level'. When `org-cycle-max-level' is not set but
`org-inlinetask-min-level' is, cycling will be limited to levels one less
than its value.
We may simply replace the faulty sentence with a link to
`org-cycle-max-level' docstring.
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
