alain.coch...@unistra.fr writes: > PS 1: In the manual, I see "backend" and "back-end". So it is an > issue similar to the "subtree/sub-tree" issue you fixed a few days > ago, to the "heading/headline" issue that was reported recently, and > to many similar cases I met in the past. So I was wondering if there > could exist some (semi-)automatic way which would ensure that future > maintainers will not inadvertently re-introduce "sub-tree" > occurrences, or the like. Perhaps some "accepted terminology" list > that would be checked upon?
I looked into the manual. It has 197 instances of "back-end" and 24 instances of "backend". In the code, "backend" is used almost exclusively in symbol names (except 5 instances), and "back-end" is used in the docstrings and comments. It is actually a bit confusing. I am looking at https://techterms.com/definition/backend, and it looks like "backend" is the correct word we need to use here. Am I missing something? -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
