Bastien <b...@gnu.org> writes: > I think it is a very good idea and a natural evolution of org-contrib, > thanks for suggesting this. > > If we move in this direction, "org-contrib" is probably not a good > name anymore: perhaps "org-stub"? "org-orphanage"? Other ideas?
I am not sure if it is a good idea to keep everything in a single repository. Maybe just create org-orphanage project, a sub-project of our main ~bzg/org project. That org-orphanage will link to the repos we are taking care of. Maybe we can even gather links to all the active Org-related packages in a similar fashion (within a dedicated sub-project). P.S. Does sourcehut have a notion of organizations? -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
