On 22/09/2022 03:56, Rudolf Adamkovič wrote:
Greg Minshall writes:
i'm a bit unclear. does your (single?) Org notebook consist of *one*
file (and thus, [normally? always? my ignorance precedes me], one
buffer), or two files (thus, two buffers).
One file, two kinds of "src" blocks.
in the former case (one buffer), i don't know if these proposals will
help. though, maybe as they are flushed out (precedence of the
buffer-local and/or global-local with header line constructs), it
would?
Interesting. Suppose I have 'org-confirm-babel-evaluate' set to 'nil'
and I answer "no to all" during 'org-babel-execute-buffer'. I would
expect that to mean "answer 'no' to every :eval query" block and execute
the rest as usual. If so, that would save me from having to answer "no"
dozen times. Good point!
Since `org-confirm-babel-evaluate' may be customized to a function,
every participant of this thread may implement their preferred policies
with no modification of Org code or even an advice to the default
function. If proven by some usage period convenient variants emerged
during such activity then they may be polished to handle corner cases
(indirect buffers, etc.) and added to Org.
However some functions will likely specific to particular users, e.g.
consider documents in some folder safe as created by the user, but
execution of code blocks from other files are suppressed because they
may be received from less trusted sources.
