On Sun, 21 Jun 2009 08:31 +0200, "Carsten Dominik" <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Jun 19, 2009, at 4:44 PM, Matthew Lundin wrote: > > > "Peter Westlake" <peter.westl...@pobox.com> writes: > > > >> If you have a multi-line inline task, with an END line, then > >> refiling it > >> leaves the END line behind. Since it isn't needed at the > >> destination, it > >> should just be deleted. > >> > >> *************** TODO example of refile bug > >> C-c C-w takes these lines, > >> but leaves the END line. > >> *************** END > > > Hmm, refiling inline tasks? Isn't this a contradiction in itself?
Well, I certainly understand what you mean, but the fact that I tried to do it shows that it's sometimes needed! The use case is a small TODO, noted in passing, being absorbed into a larger piece of work when it becomes clear that there is a general problem to be solved. These inline tasks mostly appear in the middle of my work log file, which is the digital equivalent of a lab book or diary. Everything I do at work gets written down as it happens, and that sometimes includes TODO items. > P.S. Of course we can change the behavior also in the first two points, > but I would like to discuss first if this makes sense..... Fair enough! It's also worth considering the point that the function does actually work; it just leaves a spare END line. Regards, Peter. _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
