Sharon Kimble <boudic...@skimble09.plus.com> writes: >> I am not sure if I understand what you mean. Can you explain in more details? > > Sure. This is one entry where 'org-lint' shows as '533 Link to non-existent > local file ":~/path/to/directory/"' > > ===== > *** dired > # [[file+emacs:~/path/to/directory/]] ;;; opens dired at that directory > [[file::~/path/to/directory/]] ;;; opens dired at that directory > ===== > > This is the full org-lint for my 'instructions.org' file - > > ===== > 533 low Link to non-existent local file ":~/path/to/directory/"
This is nothing wrong on Org side. Just an indication for you that you have issues with Org markup in your Org file. I suggest fixing them, for your own safety - Org may behave incorrectly on incorrect Org documents. >>> Is it possible for it to have a file-only way of reverting to the old way >>> of 'file-local variables' please? As it currently stands, no org-headings >>> are >>> shown in the colours that other org-files are showing them, and its >>> giving the appearance of org-mode not reading and displaying it! >> >> If you have no fontification, please update Org. This issue has been >> fixed in a yesterday's commit. >> > > I'm now running using 'Org mode version 9.5.4 (release_9.5.4-706-g4702a7 @ > /home/boudiccas/git/org-mode/lisp/)'. Is this the most recent version please? > Git pull says that its up-to-date. This is some very strange Org version - we have no commit 4702a7. I suggest removing your local copy and re-fetch Org from our official repo. See https://orgmode.org/ > I'm not sure what you mean by 'no fontification'? The instructions file has > the usual org-headings, and the occasional drawer. Can you elucidate please? I probably misunderstood you. I do not understand what you mean by >>> ... no org-headings are shown in the colours that other org-files >>> are showing them, and its giving the appearance of org-mode not >>> reading and displaying it!" Best, Ihor
