Correct.
1. Org should be the truth, not some export format that is picked
based on political opinion.
2. Lowest Common denominator in my vocabulary is a "bad word" that LCD
is something that makes everyone equally unhappy.
So Take-Away:
1. Make org the best format for holding the authored content.
2. Consider all exports to be either modality or use-case
specific and produce the best version that that export
format can support.
3. But then dont fall into the delusion that the export
format is the truth --
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> briangpowell <briangpowel...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Suggest OrgMode outputs focus on creating "Lowest Common Denominator"
> > documents as output:
> > TeXinfo docs should be used as the LCD doctype--suggest you focus on
> > creating 1 document in Texinfo that you use to create all other sorts of
> > documents, when possible:
> >
> > Pipeline should be more like
> > OrgMode->Texinfo->TROFF||DTD/XML/HTML/XHTML->LaTeX/TeX->DVI||SVG->PS->PDF
> >
> > * TeXinfo: https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/texinfo
> > https://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo
>
> I do not think that using Texinfo as intermediate format is useful.
> Texinfo does not support many of the available Org syntax structures
> like, for example, backend-specific export blocks. We will inevitably
> lose some document structure information when exporting to Texinfo.
> Please remember that Texinfo is by no means a generic export engine - it
> is tailored to produce software documentation specifically and may not
> be suitable for more generic authored documents.
>
> Note that we already have a much more feature-full export functionality.
> RMS even suggested that Org might be used as a replacement for Texinfo:
> https://yhetil.org/emacs-devel/e1nzqh5-0001ob...@fencepost.gnu.org
>
> Best,
> Ihor
--
Thanks,
--Raman(I Search, I Find, I Misplace, I Research)
♉ Id: kg:/m/0285kf1 🦮
--
Thanks,
--Raman(I Search, I Find, I Misplace, I Research)
♉ Id: kg:/m/0285kf1 🦮
