On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 at 09:14, Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Felipe Lema <felipel...@mortemale.org> writes:
>
> > I just realized I was un-CCed out of the thread
> >
> > Here's the updated patch with the requested changes (actually single one)
> >
> > Lemme know if I'm missing anything else.
>
> Can you update the patch making it a proper patch under your name?
> See https://orgmode.org/worg/org-contribute.html#patches for
> instructions.
Hi Felipe,
Sorry for not commenting on this back in December.
Is the error that your patch shows equivalent to (or less than) taking
a look at the '*Geiser dbg*' buffer? If it is, I wonder if it would
be better just to pop up the existing '*Geiser dbg*' buffer? (Example
appended below.)
Best wishes,
Neil
------- example of *Geiser dbg* buffer -------------
geiser-debugger
ice-9/boot-9.scm:1669:16: In procedure raise-exception:
Unbound variable: categorize-transactions-by-weeks
Entering a new prompt. Type `,bt' for a backtrace or `,q' to continue.
scheme@(guile-user) [1]>
ice-9/boot-9.scm:1669:16: In procedure raise-exception:
Unbound variable: categorize-transactions-by-weeks
Entering a new prompt. Type `,bt' for a backtrace or `,q' to continue.
scheme@(guile-user) [1]>
Expression evaluated was:
;; -*- geiser-scheme-implementation: guile -*-
(load "nationwide.scm")
(let ((classification '(<redacted>)))
(categorize-transactions-by-weeks (pre-2022 2020)
(two-column-table->alist classification) #t)
)
------- example of *Geiser dbg* buffer -------------
