Hello,

Just pinging here again. Can someone confirm this bug?

--
Kaushal Modi

On Tue, Mar 1, 2022, 10:10 PM Kaushal Modi <kaushal.m...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I believe I have come across a corner case issue where the inline src
> block element doesn't get parsed as one, if:
>
> 1. That src block is in a list item (plain list, definition list, etc.),
> AND
> 2. That src block wraps around when auto-filling.
>
> This issue can be reproduced on the main branch:
>
> Org mode version 9.5 (release_9.5-505-gef666)
>
> MWE:
>
> =====
> #+author:
> #+options: toc:nil
>
> Run ~C-c C-e t A~.
>
> * Doesn't export correctly if inline src block is in a wrapped list
> - abcdefg abcdefg abcdefg abcdefg src_org[:exports code]{[[abc
>   def][bar]]}.
> * Exports correctly
> ** .. if the inline src block wraps in a paragraph
> abcdefg abcdefg abcdefg abcdefg src_org[:exports code]{[[abc
> def][bar]]}.
> ** .. if the inline src block is in a list but doesn't wrap
> - abcdefg abcdefg abcdefg abcdefg src_org[:exports code]{[[abc def][bar]]}.
> =====
>
> Upon pasting the above snippet in an Org buffer and running `C-c C-e t
> A`, I get:
>
> =====
> Run `C-c C-e t A'.
>
>
> 1 Doesn't export correctly if inline src block is in a wrapped list
> ===================================================================
>
>   - abcdefg abcdefg abcdefg abcdefg src_org[:exports code]{[[abc
>   def][bar]]}.
>
>
> 2 Exports correctly
> ====================
>
> 2.1 .. if the inline src block wraps in a paragraph
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>   abcdefg abcdefg abcdefg abcdefg `[[abc def][bar]]'.
>
>
> 2.2 .. if the inline src block is in a list but doesn't wrap
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>   - abcdefg abcdefg abcdefg abcdefg `[[abc def][bar]]'.
> =====
>
>
> Note that incorrect export of the inline src block in section 1 above.
> The remaining sections exports correctly because either the inline src
> block is not in a list item, or it doesn't wrap to the next line.
>
> --
> Kaushal Modi
>

Reply via email to