Max Nikulin <maniku...@gmail.com> writes: > No, it means instruction to unload support of emacs-lisp even it was > loaded before.
I see. Thank you for the explanation! I misunderstood the (rather unusual) "org-babel-do-load-languages" API despite having read the documentation. > I do not insist that current behavior is the best possible. There are > still some reasons behind such choice. Then, perhaps Ihor had the best idea, where Org would become smart enough to avoid "executing BibTeX" and similar? Rudy -- "I love deadlines. I love the whooshing noise they make as they go by." -- Douglas Adams, The Salmon of Doubt Rudolf Adamkovič <salu...@me.com> [he/him] Studenohorská 25 84103 Bratislava Slovakia
