Tassilo Neubauer writes:
> Hello,
>
> Here are the steps that led to code blocks being tangled I did not
> expect to:
>
> emacs -Q
> C-x C-h: ~/org-roam/example.org
> content of example.org (excluding "):
> "
> #+begin_src emacs-lisp
> (setq some-emacs-lisp-variable t)
> #+end_src
>
> #+begin_src :tangle no
> ;;This line should not be in the elisp code
> #+end_src
> "
(Sorry for the delayed reply. This message, unlike the initial post,
will be redirected to the Org list, where you're more likely to get a
response.)
Org sees the last block above as a source block of language ":tangle".
Here's what org-element-at-point reports:
(src-block (:language ":tangle" :switches nil :parameters "yes"...)
org-lint will complain about this block:
2 nil Missing colon in header argument "yes"
And, were you to use a bare source block (i.e. drop ":tangle no"), it
would complain about a missing language:
2 nil Missing language in source block
So, I think the source block is mis-specified, and I'm not sure there's
much that Org should do here, but perhaps others will chime in with
their thoughts.
