Hello, "Bruce D'Arcus" <bdar...@gmail.com> writes:
> Can you please fix that, if the patchis otherwise fine? OK. > The biblatex manual (section 2.3.8 Date and Time Specifications), says > the following: > > "Date fields such as the default data model dates date, origdate, > eventdate, and urldate adhere to iso8601-2 Extended Format > specification level 1." > > This is an extension to standard 8601 dates, previously known as EDTF > (extended date-time format). > > So for the vast majority of cases, yes; the value would be standard 8601 > dates. > > The exceptions should be very rare open-ended ranged dates; from table 3. > > ../1997 > /1997 > > I do not, however, have a good knowledge of what people do in the > wild. It just seems like such a critical data field should be > supported. I pushed a change along these lines in bugfix branch. Please let me know if it works for you. Thank you. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
