Many thanks, Nicolas !!!
I've just tested. It looks good now. I should rather say it's excellent.
Am Mi., 6. Okt. 2021 um 16:13 Uhr schrieb Nicolas Goaziou <
m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr>:
> Hello,
>
> Elias Bounatirou <elias.bounati...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > However, it appears Nicolas' MWE unfortunately does not reproduce the
> > issue. It's not the footnote that is omitted/ not exported, it's the
> > citation in the footnote that is left out (when the footnote follows two
> or
> > more citations, of which one has a suffix). In Nicolas' MWE, there is no
> > citation in the footnote. What seems to me (being no export on LaTeX)
> > strange about Bruce's LaTeX output is that there is no command
> > \footnote{...} or the like. So is the footnote-part of the LaTeX output
> > real LaTeX? (Sorry for this naïve question.)
>
> I noticed my ECM was not right. It took me a while to figure out the
> issue.
>
> > I've tested again.
> > With verbose I get the same erroneous result: the citation in the
> footnote
> > is not rendered (using the development version of org-mode, see below):
> > INPUT:
> >
>
> [...]
>
> > Body text [cite: @ravlic2021; @saric2010 with a SUFFIX][fn:1]
>
> [...]
>
> > [fn:1]Test [cite: @senker1987]
> >
> > LaTeX OUTPUT (shortened):
> >
> > Body text \autocites{ravlic2021}[][with a
> SUFFIX]{saric2010}\footnote{Test}
>
> I think I fixed it. Could you confirm it?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Nicolas Goaziou
>
