Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes: >> At this point, third-party code is likely to rely on the existing logic, >> so I do not see any reason to insist on changing org-table. > > If you think it is overall an improvement, feel free to discuss it. I'm > merely pointing out what was the initial intent, not necessarily how it > should be.
I feel that it would be more consistent, though not necessary an improvement. Special formatting for empty cells is probably a rare need---much more rare compared to skipping them. I am fine with current behaviour if it is documented. It's just that it caught me by surprise while fixing the current bug report. >> To avoid confusion, can we change the docstring explicitly saying that >> empty cells are ignored? (see the attached) > Sure. Thanks. Applied as 60365a164 on main. Best, Ihor
