Tom Gillespie <tgb...@gmail.com> writes: > Pinging on this to see if anyone can test it so that it can be merged. > Tom
I agree with this patch. Just to make clear the default behavior and the behavior that would exist with this patch. The current behavior 1. You have a code block C1 in a buffer B1. 2. You execute =org-babel-lob-ingest= on B1. This means that C1 now exists in =org-babel-library-of-babel=. 3. You modify C1. 4. You tangle a code block C2 which includes a noweb reference to C1. 5. The version of =org-babel-library-of-babel= would be used instead of the one from the current buffer. The behavior that would be available is (same steps) 5. The version of the current buffer is used instead. -- [[[ If you see a signature in spanish below this message, please omit it. It is automatically inserted in all my messages due to the internal privacy policies of the organization that owns the domain of my email address. ]]] -- La información contenida en este e-mail y sus anexos es confidencial, privilegiada y está dirigida exclusivamente a su destinatario, en consecuencia, solo puede ser utilizada por aquel. Si usted no es el destinatario original, no deberá examinar, usar, copiar o distribuir este mensaje o la información que contiene. Si lo recibe por error, por favor reenvíelo a la persona que se lo envió y elimínelo. Cualquier retención o uso total o parcial no autorizada de este mensaje está estrictamente prohibida y sancionada por ley.
