With Emacs compiled from master, after Nicolas Goaziou's fix to remove the <tab> binding, my tab key was no longer bound to org-cycle, but instead to outline-cycle from outline.el
If I comment out line 185 in outline.el then TAB will bind to org-cycle. Does outline.el need to be fixed too? ——snippet from outline.el (defvar outline-mode-cycle-map (let ((map (make-sparse-keymap))) (let ((tab-binding `(menu-item "" outline-cycle ;; Only takes effect if point is on a heading. :filter ,(lambda (cmd) (when (outline-on-heading-p) cmd))))) (define-key map [tab] tab-binding) (define-key map (kbd "TAB") tab-binding) (define-key map (kbd "<backtab>") #'outline-cycle-buffer)) map) "Keymap used by `outline-mode-map' and `outline-minor-mode-cycle'.") I don’t see outline as a minor mode listed when I use C-h m while in an org file expecting org-cycle. Mark > On Jun 27, 2021, at 8:34 AM, Daniel Mendler <m...@daniel-mendler.de> wrote: > > `org-mode-map` binds `[tab]` which is unnecessary and harmful, since it > takes precendence over bindings of TAB even in keymaps with higher > precedence. > > Emacs : GNU Emacs 27.1 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version > 3.24.5, cairo version 1.16.0) > of 2021-02-09, modified by Debian > Package: Org mode version 9.4.6 (9.4.6-gab9f2a @ > /home/user/.config/emacs/elpa/org-9.4.6/) > > ---- > > I've observed this problem with my GNU ELPA package Corfu, which > installs a keymap with higher precedence than org-mode. In order to > override Org, it also has to bind [tab], which is undesired. > > On 6/27/21 11:11 AM, Daniel Mendler wrote: >> On 6/26/21 4:02 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: >>>> + (define-key map [tab] #'corfu-complete) >>> >>> Please avoid binding `tab`: the `tab` event (only generated under GUIs) >>> is supposed to be remapped to the TAB char-event (aka `C-i`) and this is >>> what you should bind to if you want your binding to work both under ttys >>> and GUIs. >>> >>> More importantly, if you bind to `tab` than this binding will take >>> precedence over all other bindings to TAB, even those in keymaps that >>> have higher precedence. >>> >>> The same holds for `return` vs RET, and `escape` vs ESC. >> >> Hello Stefan, >> >> I am aware of the unfortunate implications of these bindings. >> Originally I avoided these bindings for the exact reasons you mention >> and I hoped I could do without those (only binding RET/TAB and >> remappings). However I have to use these keys since Org-mode seems to >> override these keys too. Otherwise my keymap will not take precedence >> over the Org-mode keymap. >> >> Daniel >> > >