Hi Victor, "Victor A. Stoichita" <vic...@svictor.net> writes:
> Le 03 May 2021, Bastien <b...@gnu.org> a écrit : >> I suggest a criterium for keeping ob*.el files in Org could be that >> the extension is known by Emacs _or_ that the supported language is >> well-established. > > I happen to be an active user of ob-lilypond. Lilypond is certainly > peripheral to the world of programming languages. It is well established > and active as an equivalent of LaTeX for music though ([1][2][3]). > It comes with built-in support for Emacs [4]. Agreed, thanks for the references! > I see no reason to not move ob-lilypond to org-contrib. I understand > that only few of us use it these days. I can’t stand up as a maintainer > since my Lisp skills and my knowledge of org-mode are quite insufficient > for that. I was happy to see that someone submitted a patch for > ob-lilypond in January. I hope that by the time something breaks I’ll be > able to submit a patch myself. I hope too. PS: Also, in general, we are not talking about shutting down a feature: ob-*.el packages in org-contrib.git continue to be available. -- Bastien
