On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 5:59 PM Denis Maier <denisma...@mailbox.org> wrote:
> I'm thinking whether this could make the system more flexible and > adaptable. We'd still need to discuss details of course (like including sensible defaults, etc.) if this were possible, but Denis and I agree that having a second optional parameter as a function would be ideal. > And it would remedy the need to come up with all possible > patterns as it should be easy to add those later. WDYT? And even more, presumably allow third party developers to come up with them? Bruce
