Stefan Monnier writes: > Since I'm not using it, I can't really test the result in any meaningful > way. Furthermore, just like `calendar.el`, it relies on dynamic scoping > and `eval` in all kinds of ways, so it's very difficult to be sure the > result is "sufficiently similar" to the old behavior not to break some > funky use somewhere out there.
I probably don't use many fancy agenda features, but I do work regularly from it. Running with these changes throughout today, I didn't notice any issues. Within the next few days, I'll try to test some non-default settings and more obscure features that I don't use as part of my normal workflow, and see if I can find any problems. I'll also push the current changes to scratch/sm/agenda-lexical with the hope that others will test and report back.
