Tara Lorenz writes: > Hi all, > > it seems that the documentation and code for `org-latex-pdf-process' are > out of sync: Where the documentation mentions "%bib" the code expects > "%bibtex". At least, that's how i understand it.
Thanks for catching that. It seems [1] it's an old regression from f6187deca (ox-latex: Small refactor, 2015-09-13). [1] https://orgmode.org/list/877e8p1aej....@kyleam.com/ > I resolved that confusing situation by making "%bib" and "%bibtex" > equally accepted, without touching the documentation. Thus, old > configurations work again ("%bib") as well as workarounds (using > "%bibtex") which might have gotten employed somewhere. That sounds like a good approach to me. Applied (13e98e2a1), adding a TINYCHANGE cookie and a reference to the above commit in the message. > Subject: [PATCH] ox-latex.el: fix interpretation of org-latex-pdf-process [...] > (process (if (functionp org-latex-pdf-process) org-latex-pdf-process > - ;; Replace "%latex" and "%bibtex" with, > + ;; Replace "%latex", "%bib" and "%bibtex" with, > ;; respectively, "%L" and "%B" so as to adhere to > ;; `format-spec' specifications. I also tweaked this comment a bit because, with the above change, the elements before and after "respectively" no longer lined up.
