* Detlef Steuer <ste...@hsu-hh.de> [2020-11-26 14:46]: > Am Thu, 26 Nov 2020 08:31:29 +0300 > schrieb Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support>: > > > That is not fair choice. It pushes user to finally ! apply and accept > > it, but does not give chance to permanently ignore it. > > > > > > Do you want to apply it? You can type > > y -- to apply the local variables list. > > n -- to ignore the local variables list. > > ! -- to apply the local variables list, and permanently mark these > > values (*) as safe (in the future, they will be set > > automatically.) > > Well, if you are arguing for a user who chose to use emacs, configured > mutt to invoke emacs etc
I do not. Any file opened any how by Emacs is invoking those variables. Please send your opinions to bug: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=44837 by writing to: 44...@debbugs.gnu.org > .but at the same time has no idea he chose a > mighty tool, as in has no clue about programming, variables etc., That is right, I have given references. Do not expect users who obtain Emacs editor to be programmers. When user is asked anything, it should be self-documenting and it should have references to that documentation. That is why majority of actions with Emacs do have ? for help at least. Invoking unsafe variables does not even involve any help or references to manual. > then > this choice won't help neither. If you have no idea about local > variables, you can not make an informed decision about *anything* > involving the concept of local variables. Besides stopping and reading > the manual. That is right, but that will be picked by those better positioned few.
