On 2020-09-18, TEC wrote: > Jens Lechtenboerger <lech...@wi.uni-muenster.de> writes: > [...] > I was not aware of org-element-interpret-data, and I can't say I can > really tell what it does. If you'd care to elaborate that would be > helpful.
Hi Timothy, I don’t know why that is used. For this test case: #+begin_src org ,#+TITLE: A title with *bold* index_1^2 and characters &ß<" ,#+AUTHOR: An /emphasized/ "anonymous" author_1^2 with [[https://example.org][hyperlink]] and characters &ß<" ,#+DESCRIPTION: A description_1^2 with /emphasis/ and [[https://example.org][hyperlink]] and characters &ß<" Test #+end_src I get this with Org master: #+begin_src html <title>A title with <b>bold</b> index<sub>1</sub><sup>2</sup> and characters &ß<"</title> <meta name="author" content="An /emphasized/ "anonymous" author_1^2 with [[https://example.org][hyperlink]] and characters &ß<"" /> <meta name="description" content="A description_1^2 with /emphasis/ and [[https://example.org][hyperlink]] and characters &ß<"" #+end_src The title is not valid HTML. I suggest to export it with Org syntax. I cannot see a difference between the handling of author and description. So, for this example, org-element-interpret-data is not necessary for author. I don’t know whether others have author information where a difference would be visible. My suggestion would be to go with the handling of description in all cases, including the title. >> Besides, did you forget keywords or remove them on purpose? > > This is a deliberate omission. My impression is that the value of > keywords in HTML documents has evaporated over the past decade, see: > https://yoast.com/meta-keywords/ I added keywords to my OER presentations because some crawlers use them to extract topics for classification of documents. I’d like to keep that. Best wishes Jens
