Bastien <b...@gnu.org> writes:
> I think it would be best to store this information on Worg rather than > on the website: the website should be for quasi-immutable things (with > only a few people having write access), while worg is a perfect place > for things that can be collaboratively updated. My mental model was with the website as 'first class' information, and Worg as a 'secondary' wiki. This does seem like the ideal content to be collaboratively updated though. > Would you volunteer to build the list on Worg? It does not need to be > complete, just regularily updated. I would. The one other reason I lent towards the website initially though was because I felt that this could be best served by a tiled layout similar to https://orgmode.tecosaur.com/tools.html - which currently relies on some CSS not in Worg. That could be added inline, but that feels slightly hacky to me somehow. Let me know if there's a particular direction you'd like me to take with this. Other than that, I don't believe I have an account on code.orgmode.org yet --- that could be helpful :P Timothy.
