> I didn't know that eval specs support multi-line sexps, but seems that
> works, so I can indeed use this. Thanks for the suggestion.
Hmm. According to manual, it should support multi-line string. Not sure
about sexps.
In the worst case when you absolutely want multi-line sexp to be really
multi-line and that is also not possible in file-local eval, you can
define your sexp in a named src block. Then, you can execute the named
block using file-local eval statement calling the following function:
(defun org-link-babel-follow (name &optional return-info)
"Run src block NAME.
The NAME is parsed as in #+CALL: specification.
The src block should be in the same org file."
(let* ((call (with-temp-buffer
(interactive)
(org-mode)
(insert "#+CALL: " (format "%s" (org-link-unescape name)) "\n")
(beginning-of-buffer)
(org-element-babel-call-parser (point-max) (list (point-min)))
))
(info (org-babel-lob-get-info call)))
(if return-info
info
(flet ((org-babel-insert-result (result &optional result-params info hash
lang) nil))
(org-babel-execute-src-block nil info)))))
Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerde...@web.de> writes:
> Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I do not think there is support of multi-line planning everywhere.
>
> I see.
>
>> You can always use file-local definition at the beginning or end of your
>> org file. Below is an example of local definition at the end of an org
>> file.
>>
>> # Local Variables:
>> # eval: (defun your-function () (sexp))
>
> I didn't know that eval specs support multi-line sexps, but seems that
> works, so I can indeed use this. Thanks for the suggestion.
>
> Michael.
