Tom Gillespie writes: > Sorry for the slow turnaround time on this one. Having now tested > it, I think that your solution is a much better one for the time > being, so please go ahead and apply it. From this discussion there are > a number of good options for improvements in the future, but my > priority would be to get the expanded version of the body passed to > org-confirm-babel-evaluate asap with as few disturbances to the rest > of the code base as possible. Best!
All right, sounds good. Applied in df5a83637. Thanks.
