Hi, I am working on submitting a new set of exporters I've been working on (https://gitlab.com/zzamboni/ox-leanpub) to MELPA, and I received feedback [1] about the discrepancy between the package names (ox-leanpub-*) and the functions they define (org-leanpub-*). This is also flagged by =package-lint=.
[1] https://github.com/melpa/melpa/pull/6942 I based these names on what I've observed in existing exporters - e.g. ox-hugo, ox-latex, ox-reveal and most others define functions named org-hugo-*, org-latex-*, org-reveal-* respectively. I wouldn't mind renaming the package to org-leanpub, but I worry whether this would affect its discoverability, and to diverge from existing convention for exporter packages. I would appreciate any feedback about this - what are strong arguments for or against insisting in this convention vs just adapting to the rules suggested by package-lint? Thanks in advance, --Diego
