Hi Kyle and Dan, Kyle Meyer <k...@kyleam.com> writes:
> Thanks, though sadly Dan had already taken the time to follow up with a > patch: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2020-01/msg00175.html Err, my bad, sorry Dan -- and thanks Kyle for the warning. (I too hastily assume 1 thread = 1 topic, I should have checked.) I reverted my changes and pushed Dan's commit to master. I took the liberty of inlining the function and making the message a bit more explicit. Dan, let me know if that's okay. Interestingly, our (different and complementary) implementations may lead to a new idea: your implementation is like the `k' option while mine is like the `g' option (when you "got back"). I guess both can make sense, and what the user expect is to be able to enter a number of minutes *or* a HH:MM time spec in both `t' and `g'. That would also have the advantage of having less options while still having the possibility to use HH:MM. (Also, using org-read-date here seems a bit too much here, but maybe that's okay.) Dan, what do you think? Would you like to try implementing this or can I give it a try? Thanks, -- Bastien
