Hi Bastien, > Yes, you're right, my fix was wrong - I've followed your indication > and removed the second occurrence of '>. > > What happens is this: the template expansion calls org-edit-src-code > which gets the wrong source block boundaries, thus escaping "#+begin" > with a comma. > > Looking at the second '>, I think there is no need for it here (it > means: "indent the line"), so we're safe removing it without touching > `org-edit-src-code' for now.
OK, makes sense, thanks! Kind regards, Bram Adams > I still think org-edit-src-code should only be called interactively, > not through internal calls. I'll see if this needs to be fixed too. > > Best, > > -- > Bastien >
