Hi Sebastian, Sebastian Miele <sebastian.mi...@gmail.com> writes:
> * lisp/org-src.el (org-src--contents-for-write-back): Use the > potentially buffer-local value of `org-edit-src-content-indentation' > from the source buffer instead of that from the editing buffer. > --- > lisp/org-src.el | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/lisp/org-src.el b/lisp/org-src.el > index 9134d5b5d..b7fe4c0fa 100644 > --- a/lisp/org-src.el > +++ b/lisp/org-src.el > @@ -422,7 +422,8 @@ Assume point is in the corresponding edit buffer." > (if org-src--preserve-indentation 0 > (+ (or org-src--block-indentation 0) > (if (memq org-src--source-type '(example-block src-block)) > - org-edit-src-content-indentation > + (with-current-buffer (marker-buffer org-src--beg-marker) > + org-edit-src-content-indentation) > 0)))) > (use-tabs? (and (> org-src--tab-width 0) t)) > (source-tab-width org-src--tab-width) You might consider using the function buffer-local-value instead of the macro with-current-buffer. Not that it matters so much here, but benchmarking shows that it is much faster when simply accessing the buffer-local value of a variable.
