Milan Zamazal <p...@zamazal.org> writes: > Hi Adam, > > thank you for the feature. I looked at org-ql and org-super-agenda (for > the first time) and they look interesting. So interesting that I've > decided to convert my agendas to it, with some improvements. It took a > lot of effort and was sometimes tricky (although probably not more than > standard Org agendas) but the result is nice and worth it. > > I've sent some feedback to the GitHub issue tracker. On the positive > note, org-ql + org-super-agenda is superfast, agenda definitions are > much easier to read, they are also relatively easy to write (once one > finds out how) and I like the added flexibility. Overall, I like it, > it's nice and useful, indeed something like org-agenda-ng. Thank you > for your work!
Hi Milan, Thanks for the kind words. I'm glad they're useful to you. And thanks for your feedback on the tracker; it's very helpful.
