Hi Carsten, Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> writes:
>> When I call org-footnote-action, footnotes are entered inline, as >> expected. But when I call org-footnote-action with an argument and >> then >> select "sort," footnote definitions are created at the bottom of the >> section (as expected), > > > I believe this expectation is wrong for inline footnotes which > should be left alone when only sorting footnotes. That was a > bug which I fixed now. Let me know if I am missing something here. Thanks so much for fixing this. Yes, I see that it is much better *not* to have inline footnotes sorted, since they are, after all, inline. The great thing is that one can always convert them by using normalize. By the way, I can't tell you how much I appreciate the elegance of your solution to footnotes in org-mode. As a historian who uses footnotes all the time, I've found org-mode's footnote features to be the most convenient and flexible I've ever used. Best, Matt _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
