Stig Brautaset <s...@brautaset.org> writes: >>> I would suggest the opposite: move it to GNU ELPA, for example, so we >>> can remove it from contrib. >> >> Yes, I am quite happy with that also -- it would save the effort of >> syncing it. It would have to be MELPA though, because I don't think we >> have papers (I can check). This does have the disadvantage of requiring >> people to update their config/installed packages, but it's probably >> okay. > > I would love to see org-drill available in MELPA. It's the most > important package I use from contrib. Moving it to MELPA means I'm > closer to being able to live with the version of Org that ships with > Emacs, and would not have to install org-plus-contrib. > > To that end I've created a branch[1] for adding your fork to MELPA. > Based on your previous messages in this thread, I assume I have your > permission to submit a PR? Or is there a good reason to wait with this > for the moment?
I already did this. https://github.com/melpa/melpa/pull/6207 They may or may not want to accept this at the moment; org-drill falls short of their coding standards, and it will take a while to fix. On the flip side, I have automated GUI testing working now which is helping with the refactoring. It's also rather cute and I've not seen it done with Emacs before. Have a look if you are interested! Phil
